Vasquez v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 07/19/11 ORDERING that the 20 Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DECLINED; COA shall NOT issue. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOE VASQUEZ,
12
No. 2:10-cv-03254-MCE-GGH-P
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
ORDER
/
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal this court's May 31, 2011
18
dismissal of his application for a writ of habeas corpus for failure to state a constitutional claim
19
at the screening stage and/or to timely amend his deficient petition. Before petitioner can appeal
20
this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b
21
A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the applicant has
22
made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The
23
court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues satisfy the required
24
showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
25
///
26
///
1
1
For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s January 3, 2011 order, petitioner has
2
not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, a certificate
3
of appealability should not issue in this action.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 19, 2011
6
7
8
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?