Allen v. Swarthout et al
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/7/11 ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full and DENYING 11 Motion to Dismiss. Respondent shall file an answer to the petition within 60 days from the date of this order. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANTHONY ALLEN,
11
12
13
14
Petitioner,
vs.
GARY SWARTHOUT, et al.,
Respondents.
15
16
No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P
ORDER
/
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ
17
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On May 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Respondent has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the
25
entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 23, 2011, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Respondent’s February 14, 2011 motion to dismiss (Docket No. 11) is denied
4
and respondent shall file an answer to the petition within sixty days from the date of this order.
5
Dated: July 7, 2011
6
7
8
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?