Burgos v. Long et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/24/11 DENYING 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RICHARD MANUEL BURGOS,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
No. CIV S-10-3274 EFB P
vs.
ROBERT LONG, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a prisoner without counsel, has filed a complaint alleging civil rights violations.
17
See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. See
18
28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(1)-(2). Currently before the
19
court is plaintiff’s fourth motion for preliminary injunctive relief. Dckt. Nos. 18. The court
20
denied plaintiff’s three prior motions on May 17, 2011. Dckt. No. 27.
21
In all four motions, plaintiff sought to stop his transfer out of California State Prison –
22
Solano (hereinafter “CSP – Solano”). He asked the court to order defendant Long, along with
23
non-parties Alvaro Traquina, M.D., and R. Tan, M.D., to halt the transfer, alleging that Traquina
24
and Tan falsified medical documents at the behest of Long to qualify plaintiff for a disability-
25
based transfer out of CSP-Solano. Plaintiff alleged that the individuals took this action to
26
retaliate against plaintiff for this lawsuit and another suit he states he has pending against
1
1
Traquina. The court concluded that plaintiff had not shown that he was entitled to a preliminary
2
injunction based on the standards for such an injunction’s issuance. Dckt. No. 27 at 2-5.
3
Because plaintiff’s current motion addresses the same facts and suffers the same defects as his
4
prior motions for preliminary injunctive relief, the court will deny the motion.
5
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the court’s May 17, 2011 order, plaintiff’s March
6
22, 2011 request for injunctive relief (Docket No. 18) is denied.
7
DATED: May 24, 2011.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?