Kaur v. Biggs, et al
Filing
15
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 9/19/11 ORDERING that Defendants shall provide Plaintiff a copy of the entire administrative record within 60 days of the date of this Order. The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be May 31, 2012. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HARJEET KAUR,
12
13
No. 2:10-cv-03297-MCE-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
14
MICHAEL C. BRIGGS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
___________________________/
16
17
18
After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the Court
makes the following Pretrial Scheduling Order.
19
I.
SERVICE OF PROCESS
20
All named Defendants have been served and no further service
21
is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been
22
shown.
23
II.
24
No joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is
25
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown.
26
III. JURISDICTION/VENUE
27
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 1361 and
28
5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. Jurisdiction and venue are not contested.
1
1
IV.
DISCOVERY
2
In agreeing that no need for additional discovery is
3
indicated at this time, the parties appear to concede that
4
judicial review of agency decisions is limited to the
5
administrative record, unless a need to expand that record is
6
demonstrated by the parties.
7
Diversity v. U.S., 100 F.3d 1443, 1450 (9th Cir. 1996); see also
8
5 U.S.C. § 706.
9
to the administrative record unless good cause is found for
See Southwest Center for Biological
Consequently, the Court’s review will be limited
10
augmentation of that record.
Defendants shall provide Plaintiff
11
a copy of the entire administrative record within 60 days of the
12
date of this Pretrial Scheduling Order.
13
written administrative record shall be filed concurrently with
14
the filing of the dispositive motion.
The filing of the
15
V.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
16
The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be May 31,
17
2012.
18
deadlines:
19
The parties shall comply with the following filing
Dispositive motion
filed at least 9 weeks
prior to hearing
21
Opposition and any
cross-motion
filed at least 6 weeks
prior to hearing
22
Reply and opposition to
cross-motion
filed at least 4 weeks
prior to hearing
Reply to cross-motion
filed at least 2 week
prior to hearing
20
23
24
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
The parties are directed to the Court’s website for
(www.caed.uscourts.gov ÷ choose Court
2
available hearing dates.
3
Calendar ÷ choose Judge England ÷ choose More Calendaring
4
Information)
5
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely
6
pretrial motions.
Failure to comply with Local Rules 230 and
7
260, as modified by this Order, may be deemed consent to the
8
motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.
9
Further, failure to timely oppose a summary judgment motion1 may
10
result in the granting of that motion if the movant shifts the
11
burden to the nonmovant to demonstrate that a genuine issue of
12
material fact remains for trial.
13
The Court places a page limit for points and authorities
14
(exclusive of exhibits and other supporting documentation) of
15
twenty (20) pages on all initial moving papers, twenty (20) pages
16
on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies.
17
page limit increases must be made in writing to the Court setting
18
forth any and all reasons for any increase in page limit at least
19
fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.
All requests for
20
For the Court’s convenience, citations to Supreme Court
21
cases should include parallel citations to the Supreme Court
22
Reporter.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
27
28
1
The Court urges any party that contemplates bringing a
motion for summary judgment or who must oppose a motion for
summary judgment to review Local Rule 260.
3
1
VI.
VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
2
Pursuant to Local Rule 271 parties will need to lodge a
3
stipulation and proposed order requesting referral to the
4
Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program.
5
VII.
MODIFICATION OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
6
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the
7
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Pretrial Scheduling Order
8
shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of
9
good cause.
Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation
10
alone to modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order does not constitute
11
good cause.
12
unavailability of witnesses or counsel will not constitute good
13
cause.
Except in extraordinary circumstances,
14
VIII.
15
This Pretrial Scheduling Order will become final without
16
further order of the Court unless objections are filed within
17
seven (7) court days of service of this Order.
18
19
OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 19, 2011
20
21
22
_____________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?