Sofpool, LLC v. KMart Corporation et al
Filing
69
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/24/2012 ORDERING that the 65 Markman hearing is CONTINUED to 8/8/2012 at 10:00 a.m. The pretrial and trial dates are VACATED, to be reset upon resolution of the Markman hearing. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
Jack Slobodin, Esq. (CA State Bar No. 34203)
LAW OFFICE OF JACK SLOBODIN
3527 MT Diablo Blvd., #280
Lafayette, CA 94549
Telephone: (510) 847-9986
7
John P. Costello. Esq. (CA State Bar No. 161511)
COSTELLO LAW CORPORATION
331 J Street, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 441-2234
Facsimile: (916) 441-4254
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SOFPOOL LLC
5
6
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SOFPOOL LLC, a Limited Liability Company, ) Case No. 2:10-CV-03333-LKK (JMF)
)
) ORDER TO VACATE AND RESCHEDULE
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
) THE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
) AND RELATED DEADLINES
KMART CORPORATION, a Michigan
)
)
Corporation, and BIG LOTS, INC., an Ohio
__
)
Corporation
)
)
Defendants.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
_______________________________________)
)
) Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton
KMART CORPORATION, a Michigan
)
Corporation, and BIG LOTS, INC., an Ohio
)
Corporation,
)
)
Counterclaimants,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SOFPOOL LLC, Limited Liability Company, )
)
Counterdefendant.
)
)
26
27
///
28
///
[PROPOSED] ORDER
20055164v1
1
2
Upon consideration of the joint stipulation to vacate and reschedule the final pretrial
conference and related deadlines, and good cause appearing therefor:
3
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
4
The Markman hearing is continued to August 8, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. The pretrial and trial
5
dates are vacated, to be reset upon resolution of the Markman hearing.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED: July 24, 2012.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
20055164v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?