Gonzales v. Sacramento County Jail

Filing 10

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/13/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

CARLOS GONZALES,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. CIV S-10-3359 LKK DAD P

vs.
SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL,

14

Defendants.

15

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

16

By order filed July 15, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

17

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so

18

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now

19

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

20

order.

21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

24

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

25

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

26

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
1

1

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

3

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

DATED: September 13, 2011.

5
6
7
8

DAD:9
gonz3359.fta

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2