Gonzales v. Sacramento County Jail

Filing 16

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/03/12 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

CARLOS GONZALES,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

No. CIV S-10-3359 LKK DAD P

vs.
SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

16

By order filed January 19, 2012, the court granted plaintiff a sixty-day extension

17

of time to file his amended complaint. The sixty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has

18

not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

19
20
21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

22

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

23

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

24

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

25

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

26
1

1

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

2

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: April 3, 2012.

4
5
6
7

DAD:9
gonz3359.fta(3)

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2