Haller v. Biter
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/10/2011 ORDERING that the 12 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Petitioner's 10 renewed motion for a stay and abeyance is DENIED. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings on petitioner's original petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JAMES D. HALLER,
Petitioner,
11
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-10-3446 WBS DAD P
WARDEN BITER,
14
Respondent.
/
15
16
ORDER
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On August 2, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. On
22
September 2, 2011, the court granted petitioner a sixty-day extension of time to file objections.
23
Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 2, 2011, are adopted in full;
2
2. Petitioner’s renewed motion for a stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 10) is denied;
3
4
and
3. This matter be referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further
5
proceedings on petitioner’s original petition for writ of habeas corpus.
6
DATED: November 10, 2011
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?