Stone v Martel, et al.,

Filing 43

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/6/2011. Upon 32 reconsideration, the Magistrate Judge's 12 Order is AFFIRMED. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

AARON P. STONE,
Petitioner,

10
vs.

11
12

No. CIV S-10-3454 KJM GGH P

M. MARTEL, et al.,
Respondents.

13

ORDER
/

14
15

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of

16

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 28, 2011, petitioner filed a request for

17

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed January 31, 2011, denying without prejudice

18

plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s

19

orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire

20

file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

21

erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

22
23

the magistrate judge filed January 31, 2011, is affirmed.

24

DATED: June 6, 2011.

25
GGH:014

26

ston3454.850

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE