Stone v Martel, et al.,
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/21/11 ORDERING that the 42 Motion for Reconsideration re Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED; the 35 Order is AFFIRMED. (Benson, A.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AARON P. STONE,
No. CIV S-10-3454 KJM GGH P
M. MARTEL, et al.,
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 26, 2011, petitioner filed a request for
reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed May 5, 2011, denying without prejudice
plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel . As provided by E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate
judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the
file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly
erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of
the magistrate judge filed May 5, 2011, is affirmed.
DATED: June 21, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?