Edwards v. High Desert State Prison et al
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/6/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 40 and 41 motions to compel. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BRIAN DARNELL EDWARDS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
No. 2: 10-cv-3461 WBS KJN P
vs.
13
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
ORDER
Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions to compel. (Dkt. Nos. 40, 41.)
For the following reasons, plaintiff’s motions are denied as untimely.
18
In their opposition, defendants argue that plaintiff’s motions to compel are
19
untimely. The September 15, 2011 scheduling order provides that all motions to compel are to
20
be filed by December 30, 2011. (Dkt. No. 29 at 6.)
21
As a prisoner proceeding without counsel, petitioner receives the benefit of the
22
prisoner mailbox rule, which deems the motions to compel filed when he gives them to prison
23
officials to mail to the court. See Stillman v. LaMarque, 319 F.3d 1199, 1201 (9th Cir. 2003.)
24
One of plaintiff’s motions to compel contains a proof of service indicating that plaintiff gave this
25
////
26
////
1
1
motion to compel to prison officials to mail to the court on January 2, 2012.1 (Dkt. No. 40 at 36.)
2
Plaintiff’s other motion to compel does not contain a proof of service. However, both motions
3
were signed by plaintiff on December 30, 2011. Based on these circumstances, the undersigned
4
finds that plaintiff’s motion to compel that does not contain a proof of service must also have
5
been given to prison officials for mailing on January 2, 2012. Plaintiff did not file a reply to
6
defendants’ opposition arguing otherwise.
7
8
Plaintiff’s motions to compel are untimely because they were not filed before the
discovery cut-off date.
9
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions to compel (Dkt.
10
Nos. 40 and 41) are denied.
11
DATED: March 6, 2012
12
13
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
ed3461.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
The motions to compel are court stamp filed January 9, 2012.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?