Stephen v. Doyle et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/11 ORDERING that the order 18 of the magistrate judge filed on 3/10/11 is AFFIRMED. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JIMMIE STEPHEN,
Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13

No. CIV S-10-3469 KJM CKD P

ROBERT DOYLE, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

On March 18, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

16
17

judge’s order filed March 10, 2011, denying plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis

18

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (See ECF 18.) As provided by this court’s Local Rule 303(f), a

19

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon

20

review of the file, the court finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling is not clearly erroneous or

21

contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

22
23

the magistrate judge filed March 10, 2011, is affirmed.

24

DATED: August 22, 2011.

25
2

26

step3469.850

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1