Palomar v. Hartung et al
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/27/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff's 23 motion to change the case to a petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED; this action is DISMISSED; the Clerk shall docket the 24 petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in this case as a new action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GEORGE R. PALOMAR II,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:10-cv-3477 JAM CKD P
vs.
BRADLEY D. HARTUNG, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, who seeks
17
relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 6, 2012, plaintiff was granted an additional
18
30 days to file and serve a second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 22.) On November 19, 2012,
19
plaintiff filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and a motion to
20
“change the vehicle” of his litigation to a petition for writ of habeas corpus.1 (Dkt. No. 23, 24.)
21
The court construes this as a motion to dismiss the instant civil rights action and re-file the
22
petition in a new action brought pursuant to § 2254. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).
23
\\\\\
24
1
25
26
See April 12, 2012 screening order, stating that: “If plaintiff wishes to challenge the
Board’s denial of parole by arguing that the basic requirements of due process under Swarthout
were not met, the proper vehicle for such a challenge is a petition for writ of habeas corpus.”
(Dkt. No. 11 at 5.)
1
1
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion to change the case to a petition for writ of habeas corpus
3
(Dkt. No. 23) is granted;
4
2. This action is dismissed.
5
3. The Clerk of Court shall docket the petition for writ of habeas corpus (filed in
6
7
this action as Dkt. No. 24) in a new action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Dated: November 27, 2012
8
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
2
palo3477.close
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?