United States of America et al v. Jenkins

Filing 3

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Re: Tax Summons Enforcement signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/18/2010 ORDERING the respondent Stanley J. Jenkins to appear on 4/7/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (KJM) before Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, to show cause why the respondent should not be compelled to obey the Internal Revenue Service summons issued on 5/29/2009. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B E N J A M IN B. WAGNER U n ite d States Attorney Y O S H IN O R I H. T. HIMEL #66194 A s s is ta n t United States Attorney E a ste rn District of California 5 0 1 I Street, Suite 10-100 S a c ra m e n to , California 95814-2322 T e le p h o n e : (916) 554-2760 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, and C L IF F O R D BROWN, Revenue Officer, In te rn a l Revenue Service, P e titio n e r s, 2:10-m c-0001 9-L K K -K JM O R D E R TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT T a x p a ye r: STANLEY J. JENKINS v. S T A N L E Y J. JENKINS, R e sp o n d e n t. D a te : Wednesday, April 7, 2010 T im e : 10:00 a.m. C trm : #26 (8th Floor, Honorable K i m b e r l y J. Mueller) U p o n the petition of BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney for the E as te rn District of California, including the verification of Revenue Officer CLIFFORD B R O W N , and the Exhibit attached thereto, it is hereby: O R D E R E D that the Respondent, STANLEY J. JENKINS, appear before United S ta te s Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, in that Magistrate Judge's courtroom in the U n ite d States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, on Wednesday, April 7, 2 0 1 0 , at 10:00 a.m., to show cause why the respondent should not be compelled to obey th e Internal Revenue Service summons issued on May 29, 2009. /// /// ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is further ORDERED that: 1 . The United States Magistrate Judge will preside, under to 28 U.S.C. Section 6 3 6 (b )(1 ) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(9), at the hearing scheduled above. After hearing, th e Magistrate Judge intends to submit proposed findings and recommendations under L o c a l Rule 304(a), with the original thereof filed by the Clerk and a copy provided to all p a r tie s . 2 . The Court hereby appoints the group manager of the petitioning Internal R ev en u e Service employee, and all federal employees designated by that group manager, u n d e r Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1), to serve process in this case. 3 . A copy of this order, the Verified Petition and its Exhibit, and the Points and A u th o ritie s, shall be served by delivering a copy to the respondent personally or by le a v in g a copy at the respondent's dwelling house or usual place of abode with some p e rso n of suitable age and discretion then residing therein, within 21 days of the date this o rd e r is served upon the United States Attorney, unless such service cannot be made d e s p i te reasonable efforts. 4 . If the federal employee assigned to serve these documents is unable to serve th e m as provided in paragraph 3, despite making reasonable efforts to do so, the d o c u m e n ts may be served by any other means of service permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e) o r petitioners may request a court order granting leave to serve by other means. See Fed. R . Civ. P. 81(a)(5). The federal employee assigned to serve the documents shall make a c e rtif ic a te detailing the efforts made within the 21-day period to serve the respondent as p ro v id e d in paragraph 3. 5 . Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 3 or 4, above, shall be filed w ith the Clerk as soon as practicable. 6 . The file reflects a prima facie showing that the investigation is conducted p u rs u a n t to a legitimate purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to that purpose, that the in f o rm a tio n sought is not already within the Commissioner's possession, and that the a d m in istra tiv e steps required by the Code have been followed. United States v. Powell, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 7 9 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964). The burden of coming forward therefore has shifted to w h o e v e r might oppose enforcement. 7 . If the respondent has any defense or opposition to the petition, such defense or o p p o s itio n shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk and a copy served on the U n ite d States Attorney at least 10 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. 8 . At the show cause hearing, the Magistrate Judge intends to consider the issues p r o p e r ly raised in opposition to enforcement. Only those issues brought into controversy b y the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit will be considered. Any u n c o n te s te d allegation in the petition will be considered admitted. 9. The respondent may notify the Court, in a writing filed with the Clerk and s e rv e d on the United States Attorney at least 7 days prior to the date set for the show c a u se hearing, that the respondent has no objections to enforcement of the summons. The re sp o n d e n t's appearance at the hearing will then be excused. D A T E D : February 18, 2010. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?