Jackson v. Rackley et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/12/11 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MIDEL JACKSON,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:11-cv-0009 KJN P

vs.
R.J. RACKLEY, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On January 7, 2011, (Dkt.

17

No. 4) plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned. By order filed March 1, 2011,

18

plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was

19

granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint

20

or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

21

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned,

22

plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his

23

current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record

24

address of the party is fully effective.

25

////

26

////
1

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local

2

Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3

DATED: April 12, 2011

4
5

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7

jack0009.fta

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2