Johnson v. Ona
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/2011 7 ORDERING that Defendant Godwin E. Ona shall have until 5/16/2011 to respond to complaint. (Reader, L)
4
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516
FAX (916) 481-4224
E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net
5
Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
1
2
3
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Scott N. Johnson
vs.
Godwin E. Ona,
Defendant
16
17
18
Case No.2:11-cv-00021-KJM-JFM
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL MAY 16,
2011 FOR DEFENDANT GODWIN E.
ONA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
19
20
Pursuant
to
Local
Rule
6-144
(a),
Plaintiff
Scott
N.
21
Johnson and Defendant, Godwin E. Ona, by and through, Scott
22
N. Johnson; Godwin E. Ona (PRO SE), stipulate as follows:
23
24
25
1. An extension of time has been previously
26
obtained for Defendant Godwin E. Ona until
27
April 28, 2011 to respond or otherwise plead
28
reference to Plaintiff’s complaint.
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
2. Defendant Godwin E. Ona is granted an extension
1
2
until May 16, 2011 to respond or otherwise
3
plead reference to Plaintiff’s complaint.
4
3. Defendant Godwin E. Onas’ response will be due
5
no later than May 16, 2011.
6
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of April 8, 2011
8
9
10
Dated:
April 11, 2011
/s/Godwin E. Ona____ ___
11
Godwin E. Ona
12
PRO SE
13
14
Dated:
April 8, 2011
/s/Scott N. Johnson ____
15
Scott N. Johnson,
Attorney for Plaintiff
16
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendant Godwin E. Ona shall
21
have until May 16, 2011 to respond to complaint.
22
Dated: April 19, 2011.
23
24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?