Johnson v. Ona

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/2011 7 ORDERING that Defendant Godwin E. Ona shall have until 5/16/2011 to respond to complaint. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
4 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson 1 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Scott N. Johnson vs. Godwin E. Ona, Defendant 16 17 18 Case No.2:11-cv-00021-KJM-JFM STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL MAY 16, 2011 FOR DEFENDANT GODWIN E. ONA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 19 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N. 21 Johnson and Defendant, Godwin E. Ona, by and through, Scott 22 N. Johnson; Godwin E. Ona (PRO SE), stipulate as follows: 23 24 25 1. An extension of time has been previously 26 obtained for Defendant Godwin E. Ona until 27 April 28, 2011 to respond or otherwise plead 28 reference to Plaintiff’s complaint. STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 2. Defendant Godwin E. Ona is granted an extension 1 2 until May 16, 2011 to respond or otherwise 3 plead reference to Plaintiff’s complaint. 4 3. Defendant Godwin E. Onas’ response will be due 5 no later than May 16, 2011. 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of April 8, 2011 8 9 10 Dated: April 11, 2011 /s/Godwin E. Ona____ ___ 11 Godwin E. Ona 12 PRO SE 13 14 Dated: April 8, 2011 /s/Scott N. Johnson ____ 15 Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff 16 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendant Godwin E. Ona shall 21 have until May 16, 2011 to respond to complaint. 22 Dated: April 19, 2011. 23 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?