Heilman v. Cherniss et al

Filing 145

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/5/15 ORDERING that defendants shall coordinate with CDCR counsel and inquire as to the status of plaintiffs requests to correspond with his inmate witnesses prior to trial. Defendants shall inform the court by March 10, 2015 of: a. the status of plaintiffs requests for correspondence; and b. if plaintiffs requests have been denied, the reasons for the denial.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-0042-JAM-EFB P v. ORDER C. CHERNISS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for an order to prison officials to allow him to 19 communicate with his incarcerated witnesses prior to the trial scheduled to begin on March 23, 20 2015. ECF No. 144. Plaintiff declares that officials “have failed to process” the requests he has 21 submitted to correspond with his witnesses Oliver Overton and Daniel Patillo. Defendants have 22 not yet responded to the motion. It is hereby ORDERED that defendants shall coordinate with CDCR counsel and inquire 23 24 as to the status of plaintiff’s requests to correspond with his inmate witnesses prior to trial. 25 Defendants shall inform the court by March 10, 2015 of: a. the status of plaintiff’s requests for correspondence; and 26 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 b. if plaintiff’s requests have been denied, the reasons for the denial. 2 So ordered. 3 DATED: March 5, 2015. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?