Heilman v. Cherniss et al
Filing
145
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/5/15 ORDERING that defendants shall coordinate with CDCR counsel and inquire as to the status of plaintiffs requests to correspond with his inmate witnesses prior to trial. Defendants shall inform the court by March 10, 2015 of: a. the status of plaintiffs requests for correspondence; and b. if plaintiffs requests have been denied, the reasons for the denial.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-0042-JAM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
C. CHERNISS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for an order to prison officials to allow him to
19
communicate with his incarcerated witnesses prior to the trial scheduled to begin on March 23,
20
2015. ECF No. 144. Plaintiff declares that officials “have failed to process” the requests he has
21
submitted to correspond with his witnesses Oliver Overton and Daniel Patillo. Defendants have
22
not yet responded to the motion.
It is hereby ORDERED that defendants shall coordinate with CDCR counsel and inquire
23
24
as to the status of plaintiff’s requests to correspond with his inmate witnesses prior to trial.
25
Defendants shall inform the court by March 10, 2015 of:
a. the status of plaintiff’s requests for correspondence; and
26
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
b. if plaintiff’s requests have been denied, the reasons for the denial.
2
So ordered.
3
DATED: March 5, 2015.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?