Heilman v. Cherniss et al
Filing
86
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/19/2013 REQUESTING the parties to submit confidential settlement statements, no later than 30 days, as described in this order. (cc: ADR)(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:11-cv-42-JAM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL
SETTLEMENT STATEMENTS FOR
PRISONER SETTLEMENT PROGRAM
C. CHERNISS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
The parties to this action shall each, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the
18
order, submit confidential statements as described below. The confidential statements shall not
19
be served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead, delivered by mail, fax, email
20
or personal delivery to the court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division at the address,
21
fax number or email address below and marked “Confidential.” Such statements shall be limited
22
to five (5) pages and shall include the following:
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. The party’s assessment of whether the instant action is of the type that would
benefit from a settlement proceeding;
2. The party’s assessment of what factors, if any, will prevent settlement of this
matter prior to trial; and
3. Any additional information the court may find useful in determining whether to set
this matter for a settlement conference.
1
1
Should the court determine that this action is appropriate for referral to the Prisoner
2
Settlement Program, it will set this matter for settlement conference before a magistrate judge or
3
district judge. If not, the court will direct the parties to file pretrial statements.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 19, 2013.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
cc:
ADR Division, Attention: Sujean Park
US District Court
501 I Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax: (916) 491-3912
email: spark@caed.uscourts.gov
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?