Eaglesmith et al v. Ray et al

Filing 160

FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/19/2012 ORDERING 159 Therefore, plaintiffs and defendants hereby stipulate that the Court enter an Order that directs Dr. Jeff Gould to produce the tests and test results to the parties' attorneys. 47 (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DAN SIEGEL, SBN 56400 PETER HABERFELD, SBN 41723 MICHAEL SIEGEL, SBN 269439 SIEGEL & YEE 499 14th Street, Suite 220 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 839-1200 Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JERALD CLINTON (J.C.) EAGLESMITH, RAMONA EAGLESMITH, EILEEN COX, and BRUCE BARNES 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 JERALD CLINTON (J.C.) EAGLESMITH, ) Case No. 2:11-CV-00098-JAM-JFM RAMONA EAGLESMITH, EILEEN COX, ) and BRUCE BARNES, ) FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION AND ) ORDER TO PRODUCE INDEPENDENT Plaintiffs, ) MEDICAL EXAMINER TESTS AND vs. ) TEST RESULTS TO PARTIES, ) PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 35(b)(1) JEFF RAY, as an individual, SUE ) and (5) SEGURA, as an individual, and BOARD ) OF TRUSTEES OF PLUMAS COUNTY ) OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ PLUMAS ) COUNTY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ) ) Defendants. ) 21 22 Plaintiffs J.C. Eaglesmith, Eileen Cox and Bruce Barnes allege in their Complaint 23 that defendants’ conduct caused them emotional distress. Because they thereby placed 24 their mental condition at issue, they agreed to submit to an independent medical 25 examination by defendants’ expert Dr. Jeff Gould. In the course of examining each 26 27 28 plaintiff, Dr. Gould conducted various psychological tests, and enlisted Dr. Bronson to analyze the results. Plaintiffs have requested that defendants produce the tests and test results in Eaglesmith v. Ray, Case No. 2:11-cv-00098-JAM-JFM 1st Amended Stip. and Order to Produce IME tests and test results to parties- 1 1 order that plaintiffs can prepare cross examination of Dr. Gould and any other 2 defendant expert that relies on those tests and test results. According to defendant’s 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 attorneys, Dr. Gould believes that the ethical rules of the American Psychiatric Association preclude him from sharing “the test and raw data results” with anyone other than a licensed clinical psychologist or psychiatrist. On July 27, 2011, the parties entered a Stipulation for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 47). The Court signed the Order on July 29, 2011. Fed.R.Civ.P. 35(b)(1) entitles the person examined to be provided with a copy of the medical examiner’s written report and requires that the report include “in detail* * * 12 the results of any tests.” Rule35(b)(5) grants to the Court the authority to order on 13 motion that the party deliver the report, as defined by Rule 35(b)(1), and “[i]f the report 14 is not provided, the court may exclude the examiner’s testimony at trial.” 15 16 17 18 Therefore, plaintiffs and defendants hereby stipulate that the Court enter an Order that directs Dr. Jeff Gould to produce the tests and test results to the parties’ attorneys. 19 20 Dated: July 18, 2012 21 SIEGEL & YEE 22 By: /s/Peter Haberfeld Peter Haberfeld 23 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 18, 2012 STUBBS & LEONE By: /s/ Brian Duus Brian Duus Attorneys for Defendants Eaglesmith v. Ray, Case No. 2:11-cv-00098-JAM-JFM 1st Amended Stip. and Order to Produce IME tests and test results to parties- 2 1 2 Dated: July 19, 2012 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 /s/ John A. Mendez John A. Mendez United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Eaglesmith v. Ray, Case No. 2:11-cv-00098-JAM-JFM 1st Amended Stip. and Order to Produce IME tests and test results to parties- 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?