Louie v. Stomer Family 2000 Revocable Trust et al

Filing 114

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/13/13 VACATING hearing and DENYING 101 Motion to Stay; DENYING AS MOOT 111 Request for a telephone appearance. If attorney Keith Cable intends to represent plaintiff in this action, he shall file a notice of appearance within 28 days of this order. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE S. LOUIE, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:11-cv-00108 JAM KJN PS v. STOMER FAMILY 2000 REVOCABLE TRUST dba STROMER REALTY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 By order filed January 4, 2013, the court continued the stay in this case for 17 approximately six (6) months, and ordered status reports to be filed on or before July 12, 2013. 18 (Dkt. No. 99.)1 19 Thereafter, on February 14, 2013, intervening non-party lien claimant Elena Sadur 20 (“Sadur”) filed a motion to modify the stay presently in place. (Dkt. No. 101.) The motion is 21 presently set for hearing on March 21, 2013, and Sadur’s attorney has filed a request for a 22 telephonic appearance at the hearing. (Dkt. No. 104, 111.) After reviewing the papers in support 23 of the motion, the court finds that oral argument would not be of material assistance in deciding 24 the motion and resolves the motion on the record and briefing submitted. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 25 1 26 This case proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 1 230(g). 2 Sadur requests that the stay in this case be modified to allow her to file liens in 3 any other case in which plaintiff George Louie is a plaintiff. However, Sadur does not explain 4 why, or provide any authority that, the present stay in this case would impact her ability to file 5 liens in other cases. The liabilities allegedly owed by plaintiff to Sadur do not derive from this 6 case, but instead from judgments in other cases. Sadur is merely a non-party lien claimant in this 7 case, attempting to enforce her rights as a judgment creditor of judgments entered in other cases. 8 As such, any stay in this particular case does not preclude Sadur from pursuing her rights derived 9 from another case in other non-stayed cases. Therefore, the court denies Sadur’s motion to 10 modify the stay. 11 The court also observes that attorney Keith Cable, who has represented and still 12 represents plaintiff in other lawsuits in this court, filed several documents in opposition to 13 Sadur’s motion and request for telephonic appearance, ostensibly on plaintiff’s behalf. The court 14 has disregarded such filings (and any responsive filings by Sadur), because Mr. Cable is not a 15 party to this case and has not entered an appearance on behalf of plaintiff, who is presently 16 proceeding without counsel. If Mr. Cable intends to substitute in as counsel for plaintiff, 17 especially in light of plaintiff’s apparent illness, Mr. Cable shall file a notice of appearance 18 within 28 days of this order. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. The March 21, 2013 hearing on non-party lien claimant Sadur’s motion to 21 modify the stay is VACATED. 22 23 2. Sadur’s request for a telephonic appearance (dkt. no. 111) is DENIED AS MOOT. 24 3. Sadur’s motion to modify the stay (dkt. no. 101) is DENIED. 25 4. If attorney Keith Cable intends to represent plaintiff in this action, he shall file 26 //// 2 1 a notice of appearance within 28 days of this order. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED: March 13, 2013 4 5 6 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?