Bravos et al v. UBS Financial Services, Inc., Weehawken, New Jersey Branch
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER extending time to respond to complaint signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/15/11.(Matson, R)
-EFB Bravos et al v. UBS Financial Services, Inc., Weehawken, New Jersey Branch
Doc. 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
JULIE L. TAYLOR, CASB No. 154341 julie.taylor@kyl.com ELYSE W. GRANT, CASB No. 271635 elyse.grant@kyl.com KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN A Professional Corporation 450 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, California 94133 Telephone: (415) 398-6000 Facsimile: (415) 981-0136 Attorneys for Defendant UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ROBERT P. HENK, CASB No. 147490 SHERI L. LEONARD, CASB No. 173544 henkleonard@aol.com HENKLEONARD A Professional Law Corporation 2260 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 200 Roseville, California 95661 Telephone: (916) 787-4544 Facsimile: (916) 787-4530 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES BRAVOS and MARY BRAVOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES BRAVOS; MARY BRAVOS, Plaintiffs, vs. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; and DOES 1-50, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 2:11-CV-00123-FCD-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
TO ALL PARTIES TO THIS ACTION AND THEIR ATTORNEY(S) OF RECORD: WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiffs JAMES BRAVOS and MARY BRAVOS ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ("Defendant") hereby stipulate and request that Defendant receive an -1STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 2:11-CV-00123-FCD-EFB
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
extension of time to and until March 24, 2011, twenty-eight days after the original due date of Defendant's response, to file and serve a response to Plaintiffs' Complaint, which was filed on or about January 13, 2011. The Parties previously stipulated to an extension of time to and until March 17, 2011, for Defendant to file and serve a response to Plaintiffs' Complaint. The Parties have been engaged in early settlement discussions and would like an additional week to continue those discussions. Local Rule 144 authorizes the parties to stipulate to an extension of up to twenty-eight days for a defendant to respond to a Complaint.
DATED: March 14, 2011
/s/ JULIE L. TAYLOR JULIE L. TAYLOR ELYSE W. GRANT KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN Attorneys for Defendant UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. /s/ ROBERT P. HENK (as authorized on 3/14/11) ________________________________________ ROBERT P. HENK SHERI L. LEONARD HENKLEONARD Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES BRAVOS and MARY BRAVOS
DATED: March 14, 2011
Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 15, 2011
_______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 2:11-CV-00123-FCD-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?