Johnson v. Truong

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/10/2011 ORDERING that dft Khai Van Truong shall have until 5/27/2011 to respond to complaint. (Zignago, K.)

4

1SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
E-MAIL [e-mail]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson

1
2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Scott N. Johnson

Khai Van Truong,
Defendant

15
16
17

Case No.2:11-cv-00131-MCE-GGH
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL MAY 27,
2011 FOR DEFENDANT KHAI VAN
TRUONG TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

18
19

Pursuant

20

Johnson

21

their

to

and

Local

Rule

Defendant,

respective

6-144

Khai

attorneys

(a),

Van

of

Plaintiff

Truong,

record,

by

Scott

Scott

and

through

N.

Johnson;

22

Steven W. Strain, stipulate as follows:
23
24
25
26
27

N.

1. No extension of time has been previously
obtained.
2. Defendant Khai Van Truong is granted an

28

extension until May 27, 2011 to respond or

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

otherwise plead reference to Plaintiff’s
1

complaint.

2

3. Defendant Khai Van Truongs’ response will be

3
4

due no later than May 27, 2011.

5

IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of May 3, 2011
6
7
8

Dated:

May 3, 2011

/s/Steven W. Strain_ ___
Steven W. Strain,

9
10

Attorney for Defendant

11

Khai Van Truong
12
13
14

Dated:

May 3, 2011

/s/Scott N. Johnson ____

15

Scott N. Johnson,

16

Attorney for Plaintiff

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendant Khai Van Truong shall have
19
20

until May 27, 2011 to respond to complaint.

21

Dated:

May 10, 2011

22
23
24

________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26

DEAC_Signature-END:

27
28

c4d6b0d3

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2