Larry O. Crother, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Company
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 06/01/11 ORDERING that the deadline to file a Joint Status Report is EXTENDED to 07/01/11. (Benson, A.)
1 Sanford L. Michelman, Esq., SBN 179702
(smichelman@mrllp.com)
2 Todd H. Stitt, Esq., SBN 179694
(tstitt@mrllp.com)
3 Warren A. Koshofer, Esq., SBN 213350
4 (wkoshofer@mrllp.com)
MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP
th
5 15760 Ventura Boulevard, 5 Floor
Encino, CA 91436
6 Telephone: (818) 783-5530
Facsimile: (818) 783-5507
7
Attorneys for Defendant, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13 LARRY O. CROTHER, INC., a
14 California Company, d.b.a. ABC
INSULATION & SUPPLY CO.,
Case No.: 2:11-CV-00138-MCE-GGH
15
[Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.]
16
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING THE
PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO
FURTHER EXTEND, BY THIRTY
DAYS, DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT
STATUS REPORT UNDER FRCP
26(f)
17 vs.
18 LEXINGTON INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation;
19 and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,
20
Defendants.
21
IRD
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND DEADLINE TO
FILE JOINT 26(f) STATUS REPORT
251773
1
UPON STIPULATION of the Parties, the Court hereby grants the Parties’
2
request that the deadline for the filing of the Joint Status Report required of the
3
Parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) shall be extended by thirty
4
days, from its current date of June 1, 2011 to a new deadline of July 1, 2011.
5
Date: June 1, 2011
6
7
__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
DEAC_Signature-END:
12
13
c4d6b0d3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND DEADLINE TO
FILE JOINT 26(f) STATUS REPORT
251773
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?