Nelson v. Petterle

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/11/11 ORDERING respondent to file a redacted copy of Exhibit 1 to 1 Notice of Removal by no later than 3/14/11. The Clerk of Court shall SEAL the originial exhibit 1 to the Notice of Removal. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
-JFM Nelson v. Petterle Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ESTER ELLEN NELSON, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH PETTERLE, Respondent. ________________________________ Petitioner filed a ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-cv-00140-GEB-JFM ORDER "Notice that Identifying Information Apparently was Not Removed from Papers Removing the Case to Federal Court" on March 11, 2011, indicating "identifying information about [a minor] was not deleted" from "Defendant's papers removing this case from State Court to Federal Court." (ECF No. 17.) A review of Respondent's "Notice of Removal" reveals that multiple pages of Exhibit 1 thereto contain identifying information prohibited by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a). Therefore, Respondent shall file a redacted copy of Exhibit 1 to his Notice of Removal, which conforms to Rule 5.2(a)(1)-(3) and Local Rule 140(a)(i),(iii) and (iv) no later than March 14, 2011. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: Further, the Clerk of the Court shall file the original Exhibit 1 to the "Notice of Removal" under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 11, 2011 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?