Jones v. Toft et al
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/14/11 Recommending that Plaintiff's equal protection claims against defendants Toft and Walker be dismissed without prejudice re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Within fourteen days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANTHONY JONES,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
No. CIV S-11-0192 MCE EFB P
Defendants.
11
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
vs.
TOFT, et al.,
/
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
17
U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed March 15, 2011, the court found that plaintiff had stated
18
cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Toft and Blum and informed plaintiff
19
he could proceed against those defendants on the Eighth Amendment claims only or file an
20
amended complaint to attempt to state additional cognizable claims against defendants Toft and
21
Blum for violation of plaintiff’s equal protection rights. The court also informed plaintiff that it
22
would consider plaintiff’s decision to proceed only as to the Eighth Amendment claims against
23
defendants Toft and Blum as consent to the dismissal of his equal protection claims against those
24
defendants. On March 31, 2011, plaintiff returned documents for service against defendants Toft
25
and Blum, electing not to file an amended complaint to attempt to state cognizable equal
26
protection claims against those defendants.
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s equal protection claims
against defendants Toft and Walker be dismissed without prejudice.
3
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
6
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
7
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections
8
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.
9
Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
10
Dated: April 14, 2011.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?