Jones v. Toft et al
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/27/11 ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Plaintiff's equal protection claims against defendants Toft and Blum are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANTHONY JONES,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
No. CIV S-11-0192 MCE EFB P
Defendants.
ORDER
vs.
TOFT, et al.,
15
16
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On April 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections
21
to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the
25
entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and
26
by proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 15, 2011 (ECF No. 17), are
3
4
5
6
ADOPTED in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s equal protection claims against defendants Toft and Blum are
DISMISSED without prejudice.
Dated: May 27, 2011
7
8
9
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?