Jones v. Toft et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/13/12 GRANTING 59 & 61 Motions for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve an opposition to the motion for summary judgment.(Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTHONY JONES, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. CIV S-11-0192 MCE EFB P Defendants. 10 ORDER vs. TOFT, et al., / 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 16 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendant 17 Blum’s motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). 18 Plaintiff’s January 26, 2012 and February 1, 2012 requests are granted and plaintiff has 19 30 days from the date this order is served to file and serve an opposition to the motion for 20 summary judgment. If plaintiff is denied access to the law library after following appropriate 21 procedures to access it, and requires more time to file his opposition brief, he may file another 22 request for an extension of time indicating what efforts he has made to access the library and 23 who has prevented him from doing so. 24 25 26 So ordered. DATED: February 13, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?