Reyes v. Mitchell et al
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/22/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DAVID REYES,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. CIV S-11-0219 GEB GGH P
vs.
R. MITCHELL, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/
16
By order filed April 21, 2011, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file
17
an amended complaint. In the April 21, 2011 order, the court informed plaintiff of the
18
deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not
19
filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
20
For the reasons given in the April 21, 2011, order, IT IS HEREBY
21
RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R.
22
Civ. P. 41(b).
23
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
24
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within
25
fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file
26
written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate
1
1
Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and
2
served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
3
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
4
DATED: June 22, 2011
5
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
6
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
GGH: AB
reye0219.fta
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?