Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Franco

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/28/2011 ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations. This action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

-GGH (TEMP)(PS) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Franco

Doc. 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. LUIS FRANCO, Defendant. __________________________________/ On February 1, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. \\\\\ \\\\\ 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, CIV-S-11-240 GEB GGH (TEMP) PS

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 1, 2011, are ADOPTED;

2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin. Dated: February 28, 2011

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

2