Barker v. Yassine

Filing 90

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/15/13 ORDERING that A Scheduling Conference is set for Wednesday, December 11, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 26 before the undersigned. One week prior to the scheduling conference, the parties are required to submit to the court a status report.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM BARKER,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:11-cv-0246 LKK AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

R. YASSINE,
Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel on his first amended complaint filed

18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 70. Defendant filed an answer and a motion to dismiss

19

the first amended complaint on November 14, 2012. ECF No. 74. The motion to dismiss was

20

granted on September 27, 2013. ECF No. 89. This case now proceeds solely on plaintiff’s

21

Eighth Amendment challenge against defendant Yassine.

22

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

23

1. A Scheduling Conference is set for Wednesday, December 11, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in

24
25
26

Courtroom 26 before the undersigned.
2. One week prior to the scheduling conference, the parties are required to submit to the
court a status report on the following matters:

27

a. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

28

b. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof;
1

1
2

c. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cutoff dates for discovery and law
and motions and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

3
4

d. Whether this matter is to be tried before this court or the district court. See 28
U.S.C. § 636(c);

5

e. Whether counsel will stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge and

6

waiving any disqualifications by virtue of his so acting, or whether they prefer to have a

7

Settlement Conference before another judge;

8

f. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this matter.

9

3. Counsel are reminded that the provisions of Local Rule 230(l) no longer apply in this

10

case.

11

DATED: November 15, 2013

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2