Lyons v. Folsom Mercy Hospital

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/04/13 denying 67 plaintiff's Motion. Plaintiff is instructed to file no further motions or documents in this case until so directed by the court. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BART LYONS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-0268 GEB KJN P vs. FOLSOM MERCY HOSPITAL, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 In a “motion” filed February 21, 2013, plaintiff requests that the court issue 17 subpoenas requiring the parties and others to produce certain documents, apparently in 18 anticipation of trial. Plaintiff’s motion is untimely if construed as a discovery motion, because 19 discovery closed in this action on September 12, 2012. Plaintiff’s motion is also untimely if 20 construed as trial subpoenas, because this case is currently pending for decision on defendants’ 21 motion for summary judgment. Moreover, plaintiff’s general request for a “three-month 22 extension” is ill-timed because there will be no further activity in this case until the court reaches 23 a decision on the pending motion for summary judgment, which is now fully briefed. 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 For these several reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “motion” 2 filed February 21, 2013 (Dkt. No. 67), is denied. Plaintiff is instructed to file no further motions 3 or documents in this case until so directed by the court. 4 DATED: March 4, 2013 5 6 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 lyon0268.misc.3 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?