IconFind, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Filing 72

STIPULATION and ORDER SETTING ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES 71 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 10/6/2011. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP THOMAS G. REDMON (SBN 047090) DANIEL L. BAXTER (SBN 203862) 400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 441-2430 Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 NIRO, HALLER & NIRO RAYMOND NIRO, JR. (admitted pro hac vice) ANNA B. FOLGERS (admitted pro hac vice) BRIAN E. HAAN (admitted pro hac vice) 181 West Madison Street Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 236-0733 Facsimile: (312) 236-3137 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff ICONFIND, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 ICONFIND, INC, Case No. 2:11-CV-00319 GEB JFM Plaintiff, 15 16 v. 17 GOOGLE INC. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES Complaint Filed: February 3, 2011 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP -1- ATTOR NE YS AT L AW STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES (Case No. 11-00319 GEB JFM) 1 RECITALS 2 On June 7, 2011, the Court issued its Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. (CM/ECF Doc. 3 No. 55.) In that Order, the Court set the claim construction hearing in this matter for July 23, 4 2012, with the parties to file their Joint Claim Construction Statement by May 11, 2012. 5 Recent discussions between Plaintiff ICONFIND INC. and Defendant GOOGLE INC. 6 have elicited a mutually-held desire to install additional deadlines relating to the claim 7 construction process, all of which are consistent with the above-mentioned deadlines already 8 imposed by the Court. The additional deadlines agreed to by the parties are set forth below. 9 STIPULATION 10 Given the above, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE, subject to the Court’s approval, that 11 the below claim construction-related deadlines shall operate in this matter. (Note that the dates 12 already ordered by the Court are italicized and bolded, while the newly-added dates are in regular 13 text.) 14 15 16 1. February 13, 2012: Last day for each party to serve on the other its Proposed Terms for Construction. 2. March 28, 2012: Last day for the parties to simultaneously exchange their 17 Proposed Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence. (Simultaneous exchange to occur at a 18 specific time of the parties’ choosing.) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3. May 11, 2012: Last day for the parties to file their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement. 4. May 15, 2012: Last day for each party to file its opening claim construction brief and supporting evidence. 5. June 12, 2012: Last day for each party to serve and file its responsive claim construction brief and supporting evidence. 6. June 25, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.: In-court tutorial described at Paragraph 6 of the Court’s June 7, 2011 Order. 27 7. July 23, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.: Claim construction hearing. 28 All specifications set forth in the Court’s June 7, 2011 Order remain fully operative. WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP -2- ATTOR NE YS AT L AW STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES (Case No. 11-00319 GEB JFM) 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: October 5, 2011 3 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 4 By: 5 6 7 DATED: October 5, 2011 /s/ Daniel L. Baxter DANIEL L. BAXTER Attorneys for Plaintiff ICONFIND, INC. KAYE SCHOLER LLP 8 9 By: 10 11 /s/ Kenneth Maikish KENNETH MAIKISH Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 12 ORDER 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. October 6, 2011 16 17 18 19 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP -3- ATTOR NE YS AT L AW STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ADDITIONAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES (Case No. 11-00319 GEB JFM)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?