Ruvalcaba v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 6

MDL TRANSFER ORDER: MDL No. 2100 in re: Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, CASE TRANSFERRED to Southern District of Illinois. (Waggoner, D)

Case MDL No. 2100 Document 546 Filed 03/02/11 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

FILED
MAR 02 2011

IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

CU:f~K. us. DISTR~PlR1J: 2100 ;:, ITHEI~N DISTRlctvot'ttLWO'ls t:I\ST ST LOUIS OFFICE

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-50)

On October 1,2009, the Panel transferred 32 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See 655 F.Supp.2d 1343 (J.P.M.L. 2009). Since that time, 713 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of Illinois. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable David R Herndon.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Illinois and assigned to Judge Herndon.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Liti"ation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.c. § 1407 to the Southern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of October 1, 2009, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable David R Herndon. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted.

~
Jeffery N. Liithi Clerk of the Panel

FOR THE PANEL:

Mar 02,2011
CLERK'S OFFICE
UNITED STATES
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
By

Date_.....l:o;ul~~2...,..ljr;;;::;.OIJ..U_ _ __

~~~~ 1/
Ii
jDeputy Clerk

Case MOL No. 2100 Document 546 Filed 03/02/11 Page 2 of 2

IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

MDLNo.2100

SCHEDULE CTO-50 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

C.A.NO.
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC

CASE CAPTION

2

11-01359

Jaimee Fowler et al v. Bayer Corporation et al

Opposed 2/23/11

CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2

11-00344

Ruvalcaba v. Bayer Corporation et al \ \- 2.003'0 -D~H - PM F

FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS FLS 9

9

11-80161 11-80183

Richter v. Bayer Corporation et al \\- 200~ -Pt.\-t--PMF Forzano v. Bayer Corporation et al \ \ -?,OO~O- J)~rt-PM.F

TEXAS WESTERN TXW UTAH UT 2 3

11-00055

Rowell v. Bayer Corporation et al \ t-2CO'-t\ - t>~"-PMf

11-00155

Heidel v. Bayer Corporation et al

n.. 7.bO'i: 1- J>~t\-PMF