Tandel v. County of Sacramento, et al
Filing
162
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/3/2014 DISMISSING claims eight, ten, and eleven and Defendant Wilson with prejudice pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(2) re 152 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Michel, G)
LAW OFFICES OF GREEN & GREEN, LLP
1 Geri Lynn Green (SBN 127709)
2 Julien Swanson (SBN 193957)
greenlaw700@gmail.com
3 gerilynngreen@gmail.com
julienswanson@gmail.com
4 22 Battery Street, Suite 888
San Francisco, CA 94111
5 Telephone: (415) 982-2600
Facsimile: (415) 358-4562
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Sandipkumar Tandel
LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP
Van Longyear (SBN 84189)
longyear@longyearlaw.com
3620 American River Drive, Ste. 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Telephone: (916) 974-8500
Facsimile: (916) 974-8510
Attorneys for Defendants
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11 SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL,
Case No. 2:11-cv-00353 MCE GGH [Consolidated
with Case No. 2:09-cv-00842 MCE GGH]
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendant.
15
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT JOHN WILSON, AND OF
CLAIMS EIGHT, TEN AND ELEVEN; AND
PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
(FRCP 41(a)(2))
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES TO ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-00353 MCE
18 GGH AS FOLLOWS:
19
1.
2.
20
21
3.
23
25
26
27
28
In return for that voluntary dismissal, defendant Wilson has irrevocably agreed to
waive any claims for costs or fees he may otherwise have against plaintiff.
22
24
Plaintiff hereby dismisses all claims against defendant Wilson.
Plaintiff also dismisses claims eight, ten and eleven against all defendants.
4.
Bauer,
In return for that voluntary dismissal of claims eight ten and eleven, the County,
Sahba,
and Sotok
have irrevocably agreed to waive any claims for costs or fees
associated to these claims they may otherwise have against plaintiff.
5.
Given the foregoing, and good cause appearing, the parties hereby agree that
defendant Wilson, and claims eight, ten and eleven, be dismissed from this action, with prejudice.
-1-
2:11-cv-00353 MCE GGH
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION AS TO WILSON AND COUNTS EIGHT, TEN AND ELEVEN,. AND ORDER
THEREON
1
2
DATED: September 3, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF GREEN & GREEN, LLP
3
4
By:
5
6
7
DATED: September 3, 2014
/s/ Geri Lynn Green
GERI LYNN GREEN
Attorney for Plaintiff SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL
LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP
8
9
By:
10
11
12
13
14
/s/ Van Longyear *
VAN LONGYEAR
Attorney for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, JOHN
MCGINNESS, ANN MARIE BOYLAN,
MICHAEL SOTAK, M.D., SUSAN KRONER
RN, AGNES R. FELICANO NP, JAMES
AUSTIN NP, GOLI SAHBA, M.D., JOHN
WILSON, ROBERT BAUER, M.D.
15
16
17
* Permission to file granted.
ORDER
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Based upon the foregoing Stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 152) and good cause
appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) claims eight, ten and eleven,
and defendant John Wilson are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, from those Consolidated Actions
No. 2:11-cv-00353 MCE GGH and No. 2:09-cv-00842 MCE GGH, Sandipkumar Tandel v.
County of Sacramento, et al.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 3, 2014
26
27
28
-2-
2:11-cv-00353 MCE GGH [Consolidated with Case
No. 2:09-cv-00842 MCE GGH]
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION AS TO DEFENDANT JOHN WILSON, AND CLAIMS EIGHT, TEN AND
ELEVEN, AND ORDER THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?