Tandel v. County of Sacramento, et al

Filing 162

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/3/2014 DISMISSING claims eight, ten, and eleven and Defendant Wilson with prejudice pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(2) re 152 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
LAW OFFICES OF GREEN & GREEN, LLP 1 Geri Lynn Green (SBN 127709) 2 Julien Swanson (SBN 193957) greenlaw700@gmail.com 3 gerilynngreen@gmail.com julienswanson@gmail.com 4 22 Battery Street, Suite 888 San Francisco, CA 94111 5 Telephone: (415) 982-2600 Facsimile: (415) 358-4562 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Sandipkumar Tandel LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP Van Longyear (SBN 84189) longyear@longyearlaw.com 3620 American River Drive, Ste. 230 Sacramento, CA 95864 Telephone: (916) 974-8500 Facsimile: (916) 974-8510 Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL, Case No. 2:11-cv-00353 MCE GGH [Consolidated with Case No. 2:09-cv-00842 MCE GGH] Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendant. 15 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT JOHN WILSON, AND OF CLAIMS EIGHT, TEN AND ELEVEN; AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON (FRCP 41(a)(2)) 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES TO ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-00353 MCE 18 GGH AS FOLLOWS: 19 1. 2. 20 21 3. 23 25 26 27 28 In return for that voluntary dismissal, defendant Wilson has irrevocably agreed to waive any claims for costs or fees he may otherwise have against plaintiff. 22 24 Plaintiff hereby dismisses all claims against defendant Wilson. Plaintiff also dismisses claims eight, ten and eleven against all defendants. 4. Bauer, In return for that voluntary dismissal of claims eight ten and eleven, the County, Sahba, and Sotok have irrevocably agreed to waive any claims for costs or fees associated to these claims they may otherwise have against plaintiff. 5. Given the foregoing, and good cause appearing, the parties hereby agree that defendant Wilson, and claims eight, ten and eleven, be dismissed from this action, with prejudice. -1- 2:11-cv-00353 MCE GGH STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION AS TO WILSON AND COUNTS EIGHT, TEN AND ELEVEN,. AND ORDER THEREON 1 2 DATED: September 3, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF GREEN & GREEN, LLP 3 4 By: 5 6 7 DATED: September 3, 2014 /s/ Geri Lynn Green GERI LYNN GREEN Attorney for Plaintiff SANDIPKUMAR TANDEL LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP 8 9 By: 10 11 12 13 14 /s/ Van Longyear * VAN LONGYEAR Attorney for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, JOHN MCGINNESS, ANN MARIE BOYLAN, MICHAEL SOTAK, M.D., SUSAN KRONER RN, AGNES R. FELICANO NP, JAMES AUSTIN NP, GOLI SAHBA, M.D., JOHN WILSON, ROBERT BAUER, M.D. 15 16 17 * Permission to file granted. ORDER 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Based upon the foregoing Stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 152) and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) claims eight, ten and eleven, and defendant John Wilson are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, from those Consolidated Actions No. 2:11-cv-00353 MCE GGH and No. 2:09-cv-00842 MCE GGH, Sandipkumar Tandel v. County of Sacramento, et al. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 3, 2014 26 27 28 -2- 2:11-cv-00353 MCE GGH [Consolidated with Case No. 2:09-cv-00842 MCE GGH] STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION AS TO DEFENDANT JOHN WILSON, AND CLAIMS EIGHT, TEN AND ELEVEN, AND ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?