Universal Casualty Company v. A&H Express, et al,.
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/8/2011 ORDERING parties to file a Joint Status Report indicating how they intend to proceed with this action and what changes, if any, should be made to the Rule 16 scheduling order already in place. Joint Status Report due by 11/30/2011. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
UNIVERSAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. CIV. S-11-354 GEB EFB
vs.
A & H EXPRESS, INC., AMANDEEP
SANDU, AJMER SINGH, JACKIE
FLETCHER, CLAYTON BAKER, ROBERT
NEWCOMER, DENENE DELGADO,
MICHAEL IRION, ESTATE OF CLAY
NEWCOMER, ESTATE OF DOTSIE
IRION, PROGRESSIVE CLASSIC
INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONWIDE
MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 21ST
CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY,
18
Defendants.
20
ORDER
/
19
On October 12, 2011, the assigned district judge issued an order herein noting that “the
21
parties state that ‘the only unresolved issue for determination should be a paternity dispute as
22
between Robert Newcomer and Clayton Baker, who are both asserting claims as the father of
23
Clay Newcomer, and their respective interests in the agreed upon settlement, if any.’” Dckt. No.
24
49 at 2 (citing Dckt. No. 40 at 3). The order then referred this case to the undersigned pursuant
25
to Local Rule 302(c)(21) “[s]ince both Robert Newcomer and Clayton Baker are proceeding in
26
pro per.” Id.
1
1
Although a scheduling order has already issued in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of
2
Civil Procedure 16(b), see Dckt. No. 45, in light of the significant changes that have occurred in
3
this action since that order issued, the parties are directed to file, on or before November 30,
4
2011, a joint status report indicating how they intend to proceed with this action and what
5
changes, if any, should be made to the Rule 16 scheduling order already in place.
6
SO ORDERED.
7
DATED: November 8, 2011.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?