Universal Casualty Company v. A&H Express, et al,.
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/17/2012 ORDERING the parties, or party, to explain in writing by 9/24/2012, whether or not the 64 Stipulation and Proposed Order accounts for the registry fund fee assessed under L.R. 150(i). (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
UNIVERSITY CASUALTY COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
A & H EXPRESS, INC., AMANDEEP
SANDU, AJMER SINGH, JACKIE
FLETCHER, CLAYTON BAKER, ROBERT
NEWCOMER, DENENE DELGADO,
MICHAEL IRION, ESTATE OF CLAY
NEWCOMER, ESTATE OF DOTSIE
IRION, PROGRESSIVE CLASSIC
INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONWIDE
MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 21ST
CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:11-cv-00354-GEB-EFB
ORDER
17
The parties, or a party, shall explain in a writing to be
18
filed no later than September 24, 2012, whether the Stipulation and
19
Proposed Order regarding settlement and distribution of the insurance
20
proceeds (ECF No. 64) accounts for the registry fund fee assessed under
21
Local Rule 150(i), and if not, why not.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated:
September 17, 2012
24
25
26
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?