Universal Casualty Company v. A&H Express, et al,.

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/17/2012 ORDERING the parties, or party, to explain in writing by 9/24/2012, whether or not the 64 Stipulation and Proposed Order accounts for the registry fund fee assessed under L.R. 150(i). (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNIVERSITY CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A & H EXPRESS, INC., AMANDEEP SANDU, AJMER SINGH, JACKIE FLETCHER, CLAYTON BAKER, ROBERT NEWCOMER, DENENE DELGADO, MICHAEL IRION, ESTATE OF CLAY NEWCOMER, ESTATE OF DOTSIE IRION, PROGRESSIVE CLASSIC INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. ________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-cv-00354-GEB-EFB ORDER 17 The parties, or a party, shall explain in a writing to be 18 filed no later than September 24, 2012, whether the Stipulation and 19 Proposed Order regarding settlement and distribution of the insurance 20 proceeds (ECF No. 64) accounts for the registry fund fee assessed under 21 Local Rule 150(i), and if not, why not. IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: September 17, 2012 24 25 26 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?