Grant v. United States of America, et al
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/16/2012 ORDERING 76 that the parties' Stipulated Protective Order is APPROVED, except that the court shall not "retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in the above entitled action" as provided in Section 14 of the Stipulated Protective Order. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MARK A. GRANT,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-00360 LKK KJN PS
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
et al.,
14
Defendant.
15
ORDER
/
16
On May 15, 2012, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Stipulated Protective Order
17
For Standard Litigation” (“Stipulated Protective Order”), which is signed by all of the remaining
18
parties in this case (Dkt. No. 76).1 Plaintiff failed to submit an electronic Word or WordPerfect
19
version of the Stipulated Protective Order with the court. Nevertheless, the undersigned
20
approves the Stipulated Protective Order, except as provided below.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulated Protective
22
Order (Dkt. No. 76) is APPROVED, except that the court shall not “retain jurisdiction over
23
enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in the above entitled action” as provided in
24
////
25
1
26
This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California
Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1
1
2
3
Section 14 of the Stipulated Protective Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 16, 2012
4
5
6
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?