Grant v. United States of America, et al

Filing 93

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/27/12 re 87 Motion to Dismiss, 88 Motion to Dismiss, and 92 Statement of Non-Opposition: If the parties desire to have this action dismissed with prejudice, they shall file a stipulati on of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) within 7 days of this order. In the absence of such a filed stipulation of dismissal, the pending motions noticed for hearing on 10/18/12 shall remain on calendar. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MARK A. GRANT,

11
12

Plaintiff,

No. 2:11-cv-00360 LKK KJN PS

v.

13

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

__________________________________/

16

ORDER

On August 29, 2012 and August 31, 2012, plaintiff filed “motions to dismiss” the

17

action with prejudice. (Dkt. Nos. 87, 88.) Subsequently, on September 27, 2012, defendants

18

filed a “statement of no opposition to plaintiff’s motion to dismiss complaint in its entirety.”

19

(Dkt. No. 92.) If the parties desire to have this action dismissed with prejudice, they shall file a

20

stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

21

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) within seven (7) days of this order. In the absence of such a filed stipulation of

22

dismissal, the pending motions noticed for hearing on October 18, 2012 shall remain on calendar.

23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 27, 2012
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1