Aspenlind v. Spartan Mortgage Services et al

Filing 38

ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/10/12 ORDERING that defendants Spartan Mortgage Services, Inc. and Red Shield Servicing, Inc.'s 36 Motion to Compel is GRANTED; plaintiff shall respond to the di scovery at issue within 14 days; and plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE cause within 14 days why his action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARS ASPENLIND, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 CIV. NO. S-11-0366 MCE GGH vs. SPARTAN MORTGAGE SERVICES, et al., 14 ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. / 15 16 Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for May 10, 2012, 17 was defendants Spartan Mortgage Services, Inc. and Red Shield Servicing, Inc.’s motion to 18 compel discovery, filed April 11, 2012. Robert Iseley appeared for defendants. Plaintiff made 19 no appearance and filed no opposition. 20 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 21 1. Defendants Spartan Mortgage Services, Inc. and Red Shield Servicing, Inc.’s 22 motion to compel responses to interrogatories and request for production of documents, filed 23 April 11, 2012, (dkt. no. 36), is granted; 24 2. Plaintiff shall respond to the discovery at issue within fourteen (14) days of 25 this order; and 26 \\\\\ 1 1 3. Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days of this order why his 2 action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to comply with this order will 3 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 4 DATED: May 10, 2012 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 GGH:076/Aspenlind0366.osc3.wpd 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?