Hicks v. Virga et al
Filing
8
[DISREGARD INCORRECT IMAGE] JUDGMENT dated *4/20/2011* pursuant to order signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/19/2011. (Reader, L) Modified on 4/20/2011 (Reader, L).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL J. HICKS,
12
No. 2:11-cv-00405-MCE-CMK-P
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
T. VIRGA, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
20
On March 3, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have
23
been filed.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.
26
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed March 3, 2011, are ADOPTED in
2.
Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2)
3
4
5
full;
is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);
6
3.
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and
7
4.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
8
Dated: April 19, 2011
9
10
11
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?