Faulkner v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company et al

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/8/12 GRANTING 50 Motion for Continuance of Hearing; The hearing as to 47 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES is reset for 7/9/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT A Professional Corporation 815 S Street, Second Floor Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: (916) 448-7888 Facsimile: (916) 448-6888 Amanda Uhrhammer, SBN 199445 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF MARY BETH FAULKNER 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY BETH FAULKNER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY; et al. 16 Respondent. 17 __________________________________ Case No. 11-CV 000408-LKK-CKD ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF, MARY BETH FAULKNER'S, REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND INTEREST Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: May 21, 2012 10:00 a.m. 4 Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton 18 19 /// 20 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEE AND INTEREST 1 Plaintiff, MARY BETH FAULKNER's Request for a 60-day Continuance of the 2 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Interest, having been considered, and good cause having 3 4 5 been found, is GRANTED. The new hearing date for the Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Interest is now set for 6 July 9, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4. The deadline to file an Opposition to said 7 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Interest is continued and will be determined in relation to 8 the new hearing date. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 DATED: May 8, 2012. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEE AND INTEREST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?