Faulkner v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company et al
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/8/12 GRANTING 50 Motion for Continuance of Hearing; The hearing as to 47 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES is reset for 7/9/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Matson, R)
1
2
3
4
5
SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT
A Professional Corporation
815 S Street, Second Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
Telephone: (916) 448-7888
Facsimile: (916) 448-6888
Amanda Uhrhammer, SBN 199445
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
MARY BETH FAULKNER
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARY BETH FAULKNER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
INSURANCE COMPANY; et al.
16
Respondent.
17
__________________________________
Case No. 11-CV 000408-LKK-CKD
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF,
MARY BETH FAULKNER'S,
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES
AND INTEREST
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
May 21, 2012
10:00 a.m.
4
Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
18
19
///
20
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
///
27
///
28
SPINELLI, DONALD
& NOTT
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEE AND INTEREST
1
Plaintiff, MARY BETH FAULKNER's Request for a 60-day Continuance of the
2
Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Interest, having been considered, and good cause having
3
4
5
been found, is GRANTED.
The new hearing date for the Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Interest is now set for
6
July 9, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4. The deadline to file an Opposition to said
7
Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Interest is continued and will be determined in relation to
8
the new hearing date.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
DATED: May 8, 2012.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SPINELLI, DONALD
& NOTT
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEE AND INTEREST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?