Staggs et al v. Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc. et al

Filing 289

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/1/2020 GRANTING the request to extend the deadline to disclose rebuttal experts by fourteen days. Defendants shall disclose their rebuttal expert(s) to Plaintiffs' damages expert, Daniel Vasquez, by no later than 6/12/2020. The Joint Statement on whether leave to file any motion will be sought concerning the damages experts is now due by 6/19/2020. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, SBN 118517 Attorney General of California PETER A. MESHOT, SBN 117061 Supervising Deputy Attorney General DIANA ESQUIVEL, SBN 202954 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7320 Facsimile: (916) 322-8288 E-mail: Diana.Esquivel@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Allen, Bangi, Krpan, and St. Clair 8 9 10 11 12 13 Michael R. Mordaunt, SBN 66911 Stephanie L. Roundy, SBN 211871 RIGGIO MORDAUNT & KELLY A Professional Law Corporation 2509 West March Lane, Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95207 Telephone: (209) 473-8732 mmordaunt@riggiolaw.com Attorney for Defendant Mario Sattah, M.D. Carter C. White, SBN 164149 U.C. Davis Civil Rights Clinic One Shields Avenue, Bldg. TB-30 Davis, CA 95616-8821 Telephone: (530) 752-6942 Facsimile: (530) 752-5788 ccwhite@ucdavis.edu Attorneys for Plaintiffs Linnie Staggs, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert E. Staggs, and Melissa Staggs Daniela P. Stoutenburg, SBN 183785 Carolyn L. Northrop, SBN 237989 DUMMIT, BUCKHOLZ & TRAPP Attorneys At Law 1661 Garden Highway Sacramento, CA 95833 Telephone: (916) 929-9600 Facsimile: (916) 927-5369 Email: carolyn.northrop@dbt.law Attorneys for Defendant Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc. 14 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 18 19 20 LINNIE STAGGS, as Administrator of the ESTATE OF ROBERT E. STAGGS, deceased, and MELISSA STAGGS, STIPULATED REQUEST FOR FOURTEEN-DAY EXTENSION TO Plaintiffs, DISCLOSE REBUTTAL EXPERT WITNESS AND ORDER 21 22 No. 2:11-cv-00414 MCE-KJN v. Trial Date: None Action Filed: June 9, 2011 23 24 25 DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA, INC., et al., Defendants. 26 27 28 1 Stipulated Request for 14-Day Extension re Rebuttal Expert Witness (2:11-cv-0414 MCE-KJN) 1 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d)(a) and Local Rules 143 and 144, the parties, by 2 and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to and request a fourteen-day extension of the May 3 29, 2020 deadline for Defendants to disclose their rebuttal expert witness(es). This extension is 4 needed due to the unexpected unavailability of the witness the Defendants had secured to serve as 5 a rebuttal expert. 6 Defendants previously requested, and the Court granted, two extensions for Defendants to 7 disclose rebuttal expert witnesses. (ECF Nos. 284-287.) Since the last extension, defense 8 counsel, Diana Esquivel, located an individual in CDCR’s Classification Services Unit (CSU) 9 who had knowledge of the compassionate-release process and was willing to serve as a rebuttal 10 witness in this case. To that end, the CSU employee reviewed the relevant case materials, and 11 Defendants were prepared to make a timely disclosure. However, on the morning of May 28, 12 2020, Ms. Esquivel was informed that the CSU employee had become unexpectedly unavailable 13 and would not be able to serve as a rebuttal expert. Ms. Esquivel spoke with several CSU 14 supervisors to find out if another CSU staff member was available to assist in this matter. As of 15 the date of filing this stipulation, Ms. Esquivel continues to work with CSU and other CDCR staff 16 to identify another individual knowledgeable of the compassionate-release process and who is 17 available to serve as a rebuttal expert. For this reason, Defendants require a two-week extension 18 to disclose their rebuttal expert. 19 The parties therefore agree to an additional fourteen-day extension, up to and including 20 June 12, 2020, for Defendants to disclose their rebuttal expert witness(es). 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28 2 Stipulated Request for 14-Day Extension re Rebuttal Expert Witness (2:11-cv-0414 MCE-KJN) 1 2 3 The parties further agree to and request that the Court continue the June 9 deadline to file the Joint Statement concerning expert-related motions to June 19, 2020. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 5 Dated: May 29, 2020 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 6 /s/ Diana Esquivel DIANA ESQUIVEL Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Allen, Bangi, Krpan, and St. Clair 7 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted, Dated: May 29, 2020 11 UC DAVIS CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC /s/ Carter White (authorized 5/29/2020) CARTER C. WHITE Attorneys for Plaintiffs Linnie and Melissa Staggs 12 13 14 15 Dated: May 29, 2020 16 DUMMIT, BUCKHOLZ & TRAPP /s/ Carolyn L. Northrop (authorized 5/29/20) CAROLYN L. NORTHROP Attorneys for Defendants Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc. 17 18 19 20 Dated: May 29, 2020 /s/ Stephanie L. Roundy (authorized 5/29/20) MICHAEL R. MORDAUNT STEPHANIE L. ROUNDY Attorneys for Defendant Mario Sattah, M.D. 21 22 23 24 RIGGIO, MORDAUNT & KELLY SA2011302076 34112554.docx 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulated Request for 14-Day Extension re Rebuttal Expert Witness (2:11-cv-0414 MCE-KJN) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ORDER Based on the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the request to extend the deadline to disclose rebuttal experts by fourteen days is GRANTED. Defendants shall disclose their rebuttal expert(s) to Plaintiffs’ damages expert, Daniel Vasquez, by no later than June 12, 2020. The Joint Statement on whether leave to file any motion will be sought concerning the damages experts is now due by June 19, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 1, 2020 10 11 stag.414 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Stipulated Request for 14-Day Extension re Rebuttal Expert Witness (2:11-cv-0414 MCE-KJN)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?