Fox et al v. Anderson et al

Filing 85

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/12/2013 ORDERING that the 84 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiffs' 68 motion for default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARRY FOX, et al., 12 13 Plaintiffs, No. 2:11-cv-0419 JAM AC vs. 14 JASMINE DELGADO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 ORDER / Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 19 On February 13, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No 22 objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 13, 2013, are adopted in full; 1 1 2 DATED: 3 2. Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment is denied without prejudice. April 12, 2013 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?