Williams v. Gomez et al
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 07/07/11; Defendants Rashid, J. Rocha, Wachter, K. Young, M. Gomez and Kuppinger DISMISSED without prejudice. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LONNIE WILLIAMS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. CIV S-11-0426 GEB EFB P
vs.
GOMEZ, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On May 12, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
////
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 12, 2011, are adopted in full; and
2
2. Defendants Young, Rocha, Rashid, M. Gomez, Wachter and Kuppinger are
3
dismissed without prejudice.
4
Dated: July 7, 2011
5
6
7
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?