Taylor v. Monroe Detention Center et al
Filing
8
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/13/11 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT A. TAYLOR,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-0460 JFM (PC)
vs.
MONROE DETENTION CENTER,
et al.,
ORDER AND
14
Defendants.
15
16
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/
By order filed March 28, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days
17
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and
18
plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
19
20
21
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to
assign this action to a United States District Judge; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
24
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
25
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
26
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
1
1
Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served
2
within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
3
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
4
Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
DATED: May 13, 2011.
6
7
8
9
10
12
tayl0460.fta
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?