Sliger et al v. Prospect Mortgage, LLC et al

Filing 149

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/23/12 MODIFYING 64 Scheduling Order: Discovery due by 12/21/2012, Motions to compel discovery heard not later than 11/16/2012, all law and motions except as to discovery filed by 2/22/2013, Final Pretr ial Conference set for 5/28/2013 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Jury Trial set for 8/27/2013 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Counsel for both sides are SANCTIONED in the amount of $150.00. This sum shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Counsel SHALL file an affidavit accompanying the payment of their sanctions which states that it is paid personally by counsel, out of personal funds, and is not and will not be billed, directly or indirectly, to the client or any way made the responsibility of the client as attorneys fees or costs. Counsel for both sides are cautioned not to request any further modification of the scheduling order without good cause, even by stipulation. Doing so shall be cause for sanctions in an amount no less than $500. (Meuleman, A) Modified on 7/24/2012 (cc: Financial) (Meuleman, A).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ELIZABETH SLIGER, CAROL DION and SCOTT AVILA, 11 individually, on behalf of others similarly situated, 12 and on behalf of the general public, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 PROSPECT MORTGAGE, LLC, and 16 DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 NO. CIV. S-11-465 LKK/EFB O R D E R Defendants. / 18 19 On July 16, 2012, the parties filed a Stipulation to Modify 20 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order. ECF No. 147. The 21 parties represent that they are actively engaged in settlement 22 discussions, and wish to continue the dates in the Status 23 Conference Order by 90 days. 24 This court’s status conference order stated that the dates in 25 the order “shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a 26 showing of good cause,” and that “agreement by the parties pursuant 1 1 to stipulation does not constitute good cause.” Status (Pretrial 2 Scheduling) Conference Order, ECF No. 64 at 10. Although the court 3 is not satisfied that any extraordinary circumstances constituting 4 good cause have been shown here, the court does not wish to 5 interfere with settlement discussions between the parties. 6 Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 7 [1] The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order is 8 modified as follows: 9 a. All law and motion except as to discovery shall 10 be left open, save and except it shall be conducted 11 so as to be completed by February 22, 2013. 12 b. All discovery shall be left open, save and 13 except that it shall be so conducted as to be 14 completed by December 21, 2012. 15 c. Motions to compel discovery must be noticed on 16 the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with 17 the local rules of the court and so that such 18 motions will be heard not later than November 16, 19 2012. 20 d. The Final Pretrial Conferences is SET for May 21 28, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. 22 e. Trial is SET for August 27, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. 23 [2] Counsel for both sides are SANCTIONED in the amount 24 of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150). This sum shall 25 be paid to the Clerk of the Court no later than thirty 26 (30) days from the date of this order. 2 1 2 Counsel SHALL file an affidavit accompanying the payment 3 of 4 personally by counsel, out of personal funds, and is not 5 and will not be billed, directly or indirectly, to the 6 client or any way made the responsibility of the client 7 as attorneys’ fees or costs. 8 [3] Counsel for both sides are cautioned not to request 9 any further modification of the scheduling order without 10 good cause, even by stipulation. Doing so shall be cause 11 for sanctions in an amount no less than $500. their sanctions 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 DATED: which July 23, 2012. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 states that it is paid

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?