Simmons et al v. County of El Dorado et al

Filing 17

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/25/11. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Nancy J. Sheehan, SBN 109419
Beatriz Berumen, SBN 271249
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)
E-mails: [e-mail], [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant: COUNTY OF EL DORADO

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Douglas E. Watts, SBN 182274
WATTS LAW OFFICES
1745 Creekside Drive
Folsom, CA 95630
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Stephen M. Murphy, SBN 103768
LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN M. MURPHY
180 Montgomery St., Suite 940
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

16

Attorneys for Plaintiffs: TERRY SIMMONS and KELLY LANEY
17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21

TERRY SIMMONS, KELLY LANEY,
Plaintiffs,

22
23
24
25

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-00468-GEB-KJN
STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE
ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

v.
COUNTY OF EL DORADO; RANDY
PESHON; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive.

Complaint filed: 2/19/11
First Amended Complaint filed: 7/8/11

26
27

Defendants.
__________________________________/

28

1

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}

1

Defendant COUNTY OF EL DORADO believes in good faith that certain potentially

2

discoverable documents and deposition testimony in the above-captioned case contain information

3

that is (a) confidential, sensitive, or potentially invasive of an individual’s privacy interests; (b) not

4

generally known; and (c) not normally revealed to the public or third parties or, if disclosed to third

5

parties, would require such third parties to maintain the information in confidence.

6

Potentially discoverable documents include, but are not limited to:

7

1. El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department employee personnel files, background files and
workers’ compensation files;

8

2. El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department employee performance evaluations, letters of

9

counseling, disciplinary proceedings, and related supporting documents;

10
11

3. El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department Internal Affairs investigation documents;

12

4. COUNTY Human Resources investigation documents;

13

5. Plaintiffs’ medical records and psychiatric records; and

14

6. Citizen complaints against peace officers or other employees of law enforcement agencies.

15

All parties acknowledge that there are likely to be substantial numbers of documents and other

16

material in existence which touch upon a number of sensitive matters and which may invade the right

17

of privacy not only of the parties, but of a number of non-parties employed in the law enforcement

18

community, private citizens, minors and victims of crime. Without a protective order in place, if such

19

information is required to be produced in discovery, it may run afoul of privacy rights guaranteed

20

under the United States Constitution, the California Evidence Code, and Article I, Section 1 of the

21

California Constitution, and/or the California Police Officers’ Bill of Rights.

22

Defendant also recognizes that in prior circumstances, District Courts within the Ninth Circuit

23

have ordered disclosure of peace officer personnel records subject to a protective order signed by the

24

Court. (See, e.g., Deocampo v. City of Vallejo, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43744 (E.D. Cal. 2007).) In

25

light of the customary treatment given peace officer personnel records in this Circuit, the sensitive

26

nature of the documents to be disclosed and the strong presumption against disclosure of such

27

information in response to a public records request or in response to discovery in a similar civil action

28

////
2

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}

1
2

in state Court absent a Court order, the COUNTY hereby request disclosure be governed by a Courtordered protective order.

3

Subject to and without waiving any statutory or Constitutional privileges or objections to the

4

admissibility or discoverability of any testimony, information or documents produced in connection

5

with this Order, the parties stipulate that access to and use of such testimony, documents and

6

information shall be governed by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order and that the terms

7

set forth herein may be entered by the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). This

8

Stipulated Protective Order shall also apply to all copies, extracts, and summaries of designated

9

documents.

10

I.

11

DESIGNATION OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
A.

12

“Confidential” materials shall be all documents that are handwritten, typewritten,

13

printed, photostated, photographed, photocopied, transmitted by electronic mail or facsimile, and

14

recorded by every means upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation,

15

including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any records

16

thereby created regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored, which contain

17

confidential and private information pertaining to Plaintiffs TERRY SIMMONS and KELLY LANEY,

18

and any current or former COUNTY OF EL DORADO employees, and/or third persons who are not

19

parties to this suit.

20

B.

21

The scope of this Stipulated Protective Order is limited to the following categories of

documents, which may or may not be subject to discovery:
1.

22

documents;

23

2.

24

El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department Human Resources investigation
documents;

25

3.

26

El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department memoranda and related supporting
documents;

27
28

El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department Internal Affairs investigation

///
3

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}

4.

1

El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department employee personnel files, background
files and workers’ compensation files;

2

5.

3

El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department employee performance evaluations,

4

letters of counseling, disciplinary proceedings, and related supporting

5

documents;
6.

6

Plaintiffs TERRY SIMMONS and KELLY LANEY’s medical and psychiatric
records; and

7

7.

8

Citizen complaints against peace officers or other employees of law
enforcement agencies.

9

C.

10

Any document may be designated as “Confidential” upon a good faith determination

11

by a party that the document contains private personnel information, and by stamping or affixing the

12

words “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” on the face of the document.

13

Tangible things other than documents (e.g., audio tapes, products, computer disks, etc.) may be

14

designated by stamping or affixing the designation to the item or its container, as appropriate.
D.

15

A party producing a “Confidential” document may redact any private personnel

16

information which may be affected by dissemination of the “Confidential” document. Redactions

17

shall be made by such method that the masking of any text is readily apparent to persons reviewing

18

the “Confidential” document, and the document shall also be marked “Redacted.”
E.

19
20

Any party may designate material as “Confidential” after production, only under the

following conditions:

21

1.

22

writing of the new designation;

23

2.

24

The party to whom such documents have been produced must be advised in

The new designation applies only as of the date and time of receipt of notice by

the party notified;
3.

25

The party to whom such documents have been produced must return the

26

documents to the producing party, and in return must be provided with another copy of the documents

27

that bears the new and correct designation;

28

///
4

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}

4.

1

The party to whom such documents have been produced must make a good

2

faith effort to immediately retrieve any information disclosed to persons not authorized by this

3

Protective Order to receive such information, and obtain an agreement from the persons to whom the

4

disclosure was made to be bound by this Protective Order.

5

II.

6

RESTRICTIONS REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS
A.

7

No “Confidential” documents produced by any party shall be used for any purpose

8

other than the litigation, preparation and trial of this case, Simmons, et al. v. County of El Dorado, et

9

al., Case No. 22:11-CV-00468-GEB-KJN.
B.

10
11

There shall be no disclosure of documents or information designated as “Confidential”

to anyone other than the following:
1.

12

The parties to the case, including current employees, officers, or directors of a

13

corporate or entity party responsible for assisting counsel in the litigation and who have a reasonable

14

need to know the contents of the “Confidential” documents;
The parties’ attorneys, and the attorneys’ staff, including, but not limited to,

15

2.

16

outside copy service personnel;

17

3.

18

or presentation of the case;
4.

19
20

Experts and consultants retained by attorneys for the parties in the preparation

The Court or other officer who presides over any proceeding in the case, and to

court reporters as necessary.
C.

21

Disclosure.
1.

22

Whenever, during the course of a deposition, “Confidential” documents or

23

information are utilized by the examining attorney, only those parties permitted access to such

24

documents pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order shall be present at the deposition. Counsel for

25

the party noticing the deposition shall instruct the court reporter that he or she is to ensure that all

26

exhibits containing “Confidential” exhibits are labeled prominently as “CONFIDENTIAL,” and that

27

originals or copies of such “Confidential” exhibits may be released to no one except counsel for the

28

parties.
5

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}

2.

1

Any party to this Stipulation may designate testimony given during a deposition

2

as “Confidential” via the party’s counsel making a statement on the record before or during the

3

testimony that it is “Confidential” and subject to this stipulation and order. The portions of a

4

deposition which contain “Confidential” testimony shall be prepared by the court reporter in a

5

separate transcript.
D.

6

As to all documents or materials designated as "Confidential" pursuant to this

7

Stipulated Protective Order, the parties agree that they will seek permission from the Court to file the

8

Confidential information under seal according to Local Rule 141. If permission is granted, the

9

Confidential material will be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 141.

10

III.

11

GENERAL
A.

12
13

time that all parties’ counsels have signed the Stipulation, even if the Court has not signed the Order.
B.

14
15

The terms of this Stipulated Protective Order shall be binding on all parties from the

This Stipulated Protective Order may be modified or terminated by the Court for good

cause shown, or by signed stipulation by all parties.
C.

16

Any party for good cause may apply to the Court or the Discovery Referee, if

17

appointed, to challenge a designation made by any other party, or to reveal information that the

18

producing party has redacted, after an attempt has been made to meet and confer over the issue. Upon

19

such a request to the Court to challenge the designation made, the Court or the Discovery Referee

20

shall first review the documents and determine whether the designation is appropriate. The parties

21

shall comply with this Stipulated Protective Order unless the Court or the Discovery Referee orders

22

otherwise.

23

D.

24

The party designating material as “Confidential” may waive any of the provisions of

this Stipulated Protective Order in writing.
E.

25

The parties agree that they will meet and confer with the Court as necessary about the

26

handling of material designated by any of the parties as “Confidential,” produced pursuant to this

27

Stipulated Protective Order for trial purposes. Nothing herein shall be construed as a concession by

28

///
6

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}

1

any party that its presentation at trial of evidence relevant to its claims or defenses should be restricted

2

in any manner.

3

F.

This Order shall be without prejudice to present a stipulation or motion to the Court

4

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) for a separate Protective Order as to any particular

5

document or information, including restrictions different from those as specified herein. This shall

6

not be deemed to prejudice the parties in any way in any future application for modification of this

7

Stipulation and Order.

8

IV.

9

TERMINATION OF THE LITIGATION

10

A.

Within twenty days after a final unopposed judgment or demand after settlement, all

11

original “Confidential” materials and all copies or portions thereof containing or reflecting

12

information from “Confidential” documents shall be returned to counsel for the producing party.

13

B.

This Stipulated Protective Order shall remain in full force and effect and shall continue

14

to be binding on all parties and affected persons until this litigation terminates, subject to any

15

subsequent modifications of this Stipulated Protective Order for good cause shown by this Court or

16

any Court having jurisdiction over an appeal of this action. Upon termination of this litigation, the

17

parties agree the Stipulated Protective Order shall continue in force as a private agreement between

18

the parties.

19

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: October 20, 2011

20

WATTS LAW OFFICES
By /s/ Douglas E. Watts (as authorized on 10/20/11)
Douglas E. Watts
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
TERRY SIMMONS and KELLY LANEY

21
22
23
24

Dated: October 20, 2011

LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN M. MURPHY

25

By /s/ Stephen M. Murphy (as authorized on 10/20/11)
Stephen M. Murphy
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
TERRY SIMMONS and KELLY LANEY

26
27
28

7

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}

1

Dated: October 21, 2011

PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

2

By /s/ Beatriz Berumen
Nancy J. Sheehan
Beatriz Berumen
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF EL DORADO

3
4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9

Having reviewed the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing,

10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 25, 2011

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

8

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}

1

ATTACHMENT A

2

NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

3

I, _______________________________, hereby swear that I am fully familiar with the terms

4

and conditions of the Stipulated Protective Order entered in

5

States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:11-CV-00468-GEB-KJN, and

6

hereby agree to comply with and be bound by the terms and conditions of said Order, unless and until

7

modified by further Order of this Court. I hereby consent to the jurisdiction of said Court for purposes

8

of enforcing this Order.
Dated: _______________

9

_______________________ in United

______________________________________

10

_________________________________

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

9

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
{00940878.DOC}