Garduno v. McDonald
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/6/2011 ORDERING that the 24 second amended petition is STRICKEN due to petitioner's failure to obtain leave to amend; plaintiff may file a motion to amend no later than 30 days; respondent may file a response to any such motion to amend no later than 30 days after the motion is filed; and petitioner's 25 motion to stay the second amended petition is DENIED as inapposite, without prejudice. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
STEVEN LAWRENCE GARDUNO,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Petitioner,
No. CIV S-11-0469 CKD P
vs.
MIKE D. MCDONALD,
Respondent.
ORDER
/
This federal habeas action is proceeding on the first amended petition (hereinafter
17
“FAP”) in which petitioner challenges his 2009 conviction for assault with a firearm and
18
possession of a firearm by a felon. Respondent filed an answer to the FAP on June 28, 2011, and
19
petitioner filed a traverse on September 16, 2011. (Dkt. Nos. 14, 23.)
20
Complicating matters, petitioner on July 13, 2011 filed another habeas petition
21
challenging his 2009 conviction and sentence, which originated a new action, Garduno v.
22
McDonald, CIV S-11-1835 CKD P (E.D. Cal.) (“Garduno II”). On October 25, 2011, noting that
23
petitioner had two active habeas cases challenging the same conviction, this court ordered that
24
the petition in Garduno II be re-filed as an “amended petition” in the instant case and ordered that
25
Garduno II be closed. (Garduno II, Dkt. No. 9.) Thus, the Garduno II petition is now labeled a
26
Second Amended Petition in the instant action. (Dkt. No. 24.)
1
The court also transferred petitioner’s September 14, 2011 motion to stay certain
2
claims in his Garduno II petition in order to exhaust state remedies as to those claims. (Id.) That
3
motion is now Docket No. 25 in the instant action.
4
Nothing in the court’s order transferring the Garduno II petition gave petitioner
5
leave to proceed on the Second Amended Petition in the instant action. Habeas corpus petitions
6
may be amended as provided in the rules of procedure applicable to civil actions. 28 U.S.C. §
7
2242. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that a party may amend his or her pleading
8
“once as a matter of course within: (A) 21 days after serving it, or (B) . . . 21 days after service of
9
a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever
10
is earlier.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). “In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with
11
the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave. The court should freely give leave
12
where justice so requires.” Id.; see also E.D. Local Rule 220 (emphasis added). Although the
13
allegations of a pro se complaint are held to “less stringent standards than formal pleadings
14
drafted by lawyers,” Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam), plaintiff is
15
required to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Eastern
16
District of California.
17
Here, petitioner filed a July 13, 2011 petition challenging his 2009 conviction and
18
sentence more than 21 days after the FAP was served on respondent. (See Dkt. No. 8.)
19
Petitioner has not secured respondent’s written consent for filing a Second Amended Petition;
20
nor has he sought the court’s leave as required by the federal rules. Accordingly, the court will
21
strike the Second Amended Petition, and this action will continue to proceed on the FAP.
22
Should petitioner wish to seek the court’s leave to proceed on the Second Amended Petition, the
23
court will grant him 30 days to file a motion for leave to amend. Respondent will be granted an
24
additional 30 days to respond to any such motion.
25
26
Because petitioner’s September 14, 2011 motion to stay does not apply to any
operative petition, the court will deny that motion as inapposite. However, petitioner will not be
1
prejudiced from renewing the motion to stay if, at some future date, this action proceeds on the
2
Second Amended Petition.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The Second Amended Petition filed on July 13, 2011 and transferred to this
5
action on October 25, 2011 (Dkt. No. 24) is stricken due to petitioner’s failure to obtain leave to
6
amend;
7
8
2. Plaintiff may file a motion to amend no later than 30 days after issuance of this
order;
9
10
3. Respondent may file a response to any such motion to amend no later than 30
days after the motion is filed; and
11
4. Petitioner’s September 14, 2011 motion to stay the Second Amended Petition
12
(Dkt. No. 25) is denied as inapposite, without prejudice to renewal if and when this action
13
proceeds on the Second Amended Petition.
14
Dated: December 6, 2011
15
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
gard0469.ord2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?