Suggs v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/25/11 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

AARON L. SUGGS,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,

No. CIV S-11-0471 DAD P

vs.
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,

14
Defendants.
15

ORDER
/

16

A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by

17

the postal service as undeliverable. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule

18

183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address

19

change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal

20

service and plaintiff has failed to notify the court of a current address.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without

22

prejudice. See Local Rule 183(b).

23

DATED: July 25, 2011.

24
25
26

DAD:9:md
sugg0471.33a

1