Roberts v. Brown, et al

Filing 95

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/05/14 ordering this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 PAUL D. ROBERTS, 2:11-cv-0474-MCE-DAD 13 14 v. Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) 15 16 JERRY BROWN, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Paul D. Roberts (F-59111) and Defendants Bevan, McDonald, and the California 20 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, 21 the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 23 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dated: September 2, 2014 _/s/ Paul D. Roberts by THD___________ Paul D. Roberts (F-59111) Plaintiff Pro Se Dated: September 2, 2014 _/s/ Timothy H. Delgado_____________ Timothy H. Delgado Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General’s Office Attorney for Defendants Bevan, McDonald, and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 The undersigned has reviewed the stipulation signed by the parties. Pursuant to that stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 10 1. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and 11 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 12 Dated: September 5, 2014 13 14 /robe0474.stip(2) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?