Roberts v. Brown, et al
Filing
95
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/05/14 ordering this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
PAUL D. ROBERTS,
2:11-cv-0474-MCE-DAD
13
14
v.
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
15
16
JERRY BROWN, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiff Paul D. Roberts (F-59111) and Defendants Bevan, McDonald, and the California
20
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore,
21
the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil
22
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
23
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
Dated: September 2, 2014
_/s/ Paul D. Roberts by THD___________
Paul D. Roberts (F-59111)
Plaintiff Pro Se
Dated: September 2, 2014
_/s/ Timothy H. Delgado_____________
Timothy H. Delgado
Deputy Attorney General
California Attorney General’s Office
Attorney for Defendants Bevan, McDonald, and
the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
The undersigned has reviewed the stipulation signed by the parties. Pursuant to that
stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
10
1. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and
11
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
12
Dated: September 5, 2014
13
14
/robe0474.stip(2)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?